<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Circulation &#187; wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lindybrown.com/blog/tag/wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lindybrown.com/blog</link>
	<description>Mixing Student Affairs &#38; Information Sciences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia: a reminder to double check your sources!</title>
		<link>http://lindybrown.com/blog/2010/04/wikipedia-a-reminder-why-it-may-not-always-be-the-best-source/</link>
		<comments>http://lindybrown.com/blog/2010/04/wikipedia-a-reminder-why-it-may-not-always-be-the-best-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lindybr1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindybrown.com/blog/?p=1440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The development of Wikipedia is a wonderful story and splendid example of the power of community, but I am reminded of the importance of double-checking my sources, especially when referring to community-edited content. While not intentional, a Huffington Post blurb about the &#8220;Funniest Acts of Vandalism on Wikipedia Ever&#8221; calls attention to this. Out of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lindybrown.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Picture-21.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1441" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px;" title="Picture 21" src="http://lindybrown.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Picture-21-300x218.png" alt="" width="300" height="218" /></a>The development of <a title="wikipedia" href="http://www.wikipedia.org/" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a> is a wonderful story and splendid example of the power of community, but I am reminded of the importance of double-checking my sources, especially when referring to community-edited content. While not intentional, a <em><a title="huffingtonpost" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/">Huffington Post</a></em> blurb about the &#8220;<a title="huffpost on wikipedia" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/06/the-funniest-acts-of-wiki_n_522077.html" target="_blank">Funniest Acts of Vandalism on Wikipedia Ever</a>&#8221; calls attention to this.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, I went to <a title="bill gates wikipedia page" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates" target="_blank">Bill Gates&#8217; Wikipedia page</a>, clicked on the &#8216;<a title="history" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bill_Gates&amp;limit=500&amp;action=history" target="_blank">history</a>&#8216; option to see all the revisions and then did a control-F (aka <em>find</em>) for &#8220;vandalism.&#8221; In the first 500 revisions, I found 22 cases of vandalism &#8212; some funny, some probably honest mistakes and some just downright mean. This is a reminder of the speed at which these pages may change and at any moment, you could be reading erroneous information&#8230; or see a mustache painted on someone&#8217;s picture.</p>
<p>Always double-check your sources for confirmation of information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lindybrown.com/blog/2010/04/wikipedia-a-reminder-why-it-may-not-always-be-the-best-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

