<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Circulation &#187; screenjelly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lindybrown.com/blog/tag/screenjelly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lindybrown.com/blog</link>
	<description>Mixing Student Affairs &#38; Information Sciences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Screenjelly &#8211; quick and easy screencasting, no download, no fuss!</title>
		<link>http://lindybrown.com/blog/2009/07/screenjelly-quick-and-easy-screencasting-no-download-no-fuss/</link>
		<comments>http://lindybrown.com/blog/2009/07/screenjelly-quick-and-easy-screencasting-no-download-no-fuss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lindybr1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screencasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screenjelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twittertools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindyjb.wordpress.com/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I read about ScreenJelly on TechCrunch and thought I&#8217;d try it out. I have been impressed with other screencasting tools such as Jing, ScreenCastle, ScreenCast-O-Matic, Webinaria, etc, but ScreenJelly is just so darn easy to use. It&#8217;s browser-based, so no need to download anything. You can record your voice as you record what&#8217;s going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-858 floatleft" title="Picture 5" src="http://lindyjb.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/picture-5.png?w=300" alt="Picture 5" width="300" height="127" />Yesterday I read about <a href="http://www.screenjelly.com/" target="_blank">ScreenJelly</a> on <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/07/tweet-those-screencasts-with-screenjelly/" target="_blank">TechCrunch</a> and thought I&#8217;d try it out. I have been impressed with other screencasting tools such as <a href="http://www.jingproject.com/" target="_blank">Jing</a>, <a href="http://screencastle.com/" target="_blank">ScreenCastle</a>, <a href="http://screencast-o-matic.com/" target="_blank">ScreenCast-O-Matic</a>, <a href="http://www.webinaria.com/" target="_blank">Webinaria</a>, etc, but ScreenJelly is just so darn easy to use. It&#8217;s browser-based, so no need to download anything. You can record your voice as you record what&#8217;s going on your computer screen. ScreenJelly allows up to three minutes of recording, so you better be concise (which, in my opinion, is a good thing!) Like most other screen casting tools, I think it has great educational implications &#8211; you can easily record short tutorials and presentations, but ScreenJelly allows you to tweet it, email it and/or upload it to Facebook, StumbleUpon, etc.</p>
<p>I played around with it and found it really easy to use. <a href="http://screenjel.ly/EGsr3SjxD-Y" target="_blank">I created a short video</a> &#8212; please take it easy on me, I was just testing it out. My personal reaction to what ScreenJelly has to offer is positive. The only downsides to ScreenJelly is the three-minute limit and the fact that there is no option to embed it into webpages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lindybrown.com/blog/2009/07/screenjelly-quick-and-easy-screencasting-no-download-no-fuss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

